Teaching Resources

Sociology labs, free to use

67 self-contained teaching labs for introductory sociology, criminology, white-collar crime, and research methods. Each one opens in a browser, holds real published data or real cases, and asks students for a judgment before it shows them the evidence.

What these are

I write these for my own classes, and I run them during class rather than assigning them as homework. A lab takes somewhere between fifteen and forty minutes. The pattern is nearly always the same: a student is asked to commit to an estimate, a classification, or a judgment, and only then does the page show what the published data or the case record says. The gap between the two is the lesson.

They are plain web pages. There is no account to create, no server behind them, and nothing a student enters is transmitted anywhere, which means they work on a phone, on a laptop, from a projector, or from a link posted in a learning management system. Students copy their finished work out of the page and submit it however the course normally collects work.

You are welcome to use any of these in your own teaching, to change them, and to strip my course references out. If you build on one, I would be glad to hear about it.

Browse the repository

Showing all 67 labs.

  • Introduction to Sociology

    You Draw It

    Students sketch their prediction of a social trend on a blank axis before the real series is revealed, which turns a passive chart into a record of what they believed and how wrong it was.

    Open the lab: You Draw It

  • Introduction to Sociology

    How to Lie with a Chart

    Real published data with controls that change only how it is drawn. The axis baseline, direction, and scale move; the numbers never do. Students see how far a presentation can be pushed without a single false value.

    Open the lab: How to Lie with a Chart

  • Introduction to Sociology

    Census Categories

    Every race and ethnicity option that has appeared on a United States census questionnaire since 1790, shown by year, so students can watch an official classification system change shape around the population it claims to count.

    Open the lab: Census Categories

  • Introduction to Sociology

    Culture Compare

    Published cross-national survey measurements of cultural traits, including norm tightness and individualism, arranged so students can compare countries and interrogate what a national average can and cannot support.

    Open the lab: Culture Compare

  • Introduction to Sociology

    Sites of Socialization

    Data on family, school, peers, media, and religion as agents of socialization, with the relative weight of each put in front of students rather than asserted.

    Open the lab: Sites of Socialization

  • Introduction to Sociology

    Front Stage

    Goffman wrote about dinner parties and shop counters in 1959. This lab tests dramaturgical analysis against contemporary evidence about self-presentation and audience.

    Open the lab: Front Stage

  • Introduction to Sociology

    Best Practices

    A simulation of the rationalized workplace, in which students apply efficiency logic to a work process and confront what the resulting standardization does to the people inside it.

    Open the lab: Best Practices

  • Introduction to Sociology

    Launch Control

    Why good organizations do bad things. Students work through an organizational decision in which no individual does anything obviously wrong and the outcome is a disaster anyway.

    Open the lab: Launch Control

  • Introduction to Sociology

    The Schelling Segregation Model

    A runnable agent model in which nobody prefers segregation and every agent only wants not to be badly outnumbered on its own block. Students set the tolerance threshold and watch the neighborhood sort itself anyway.

    Open the lab: The Schelling Segregation Model

  • Introduction to Sociology

    The Whole Pie, Guessed First

    Students guess the composition of American incarceration before seeing it, then compare their estimate against the published breakdown and consider what labeling theory predicts about who ends up counted.

    Open the lab: The Whole Pie, Guessed First

  • Introduction to Sociology

    Where Would You Put It? Drug Laws

    Drug laws sort substances into categories, and each category brings a different reaction, from a pharmacy shelf to a prison sentence. Students work through a simplified version of the federal scheduling system and decide where substances belong before seeing where the law puts them.

    Open the lab: Where Would You Put It? Drug Laws

  • Introduction to Sociology

    Life Chances

    Weber's concept made measurable. Students set the circumstances of a birth, including parents' income, race and ethnicity, and gender, and see what published data on millions of Americans say about that child's odds in education, health, and income.

    Open the lab: Life Chances

  • Introduction to Sociology

    Born Lucky

    Nobody chooses where they start. Students live two childhoods side by side, one that starts in the bottom fifth and one in the top fifth, make the same kinds of choices at five stages of each, and see what the starting point did to every outcome.

    Open the lab: Born Lucky

  • Introduction to Sociology

    The Pay Gap, Taken Apart

    The raw gender pay gap, then what survives when occupation, hours, and experience are held constant, then what is left over. Students take the number apart rather than accepting or dismissing it whole.

    Open the lab: The Pay Gap, Taken Apart

  • Introduction to Sociology

    The Family, Measured

    Marriage, divorce, how couples meet, the division of household labor, and the evidence on what family structure does and does not do to child outcomes.

    Open the lab: The Family, Measured

  • Introduction to Sociology

    The Three Drivers

    Births, deaths, and migration, with the published series for each and the forecasts they add up to. Students build a population story from its three components.

    Open the lab: The Three Drivers

  • Introduction to Sociology

    The Movement

    How social change actually happens. Students work through the resources, framing, and political opportunity behind a movement rather than treating change as the result of sentiment.

    Open the lab: The Movement

  • Criminology

    The Perception Gap

    The distance between what Americans believe about crime and what crime data show. Students estimate first, then meet the measurements, then account for the gap.

    Open the lab: The Perception Gap

  • Criminology

    What Are You Counting?

    Every crime number was produced by an institution with a procedure. Students specify exactly what their chosen offense type consists of and find out how much of it any given system counts.

    Open the lab: What Are You Counting?

  • Criminology

    The Dark Figure

    Where official crime data come from, how victimization surveys differ, and what neither one can see. The lab builds the funnel from incident to statistic step by step.

    Open the lab: The Dark Figure

  • Criminology

    Sorting Crime

    A typology is a filing system, and filing systems have consequences. Students sort real events into violent, property, and public order categories and discover the cases that break the scheme.

    Open the lab: Sorting Crime

  • Criminology

    The Harm Gap

    Offenses that do not fit the machinery built for street crime: crime in suites, crime as enterprise, and crime that scales. Students compare harm against enforcement attention.

    Open the lab: The Harm Gap

  • Criminology

    The Pattern Test

    Crime is patterned rather than random, and those regularities are the reason criminological theory exists. Students identify the patterns their theories will later have to explain.

    Open the lab: The Pattern Test

  • Criminology

    Beccaria's Arithmetic

    Beccaria argued in 1764 that punishment should work like arithmetic. Students run the calculation under varying certainty, severity, and celerity, and find where the arithmetic stops predicting behavior.

    Open the lab: Beccaria's Arithmetic

  • Criminology

    Who Taught You That?

    Differential association against the chapter that came before it. If crime requires no teaching, only a failure of restraint, what work is left for a learning theory to do?

    Open the lab: Who Taught You That?

  • Criminology

    Told to Win

    Merton's nine-page 1938 argument, tested. American culture prescribes the same goal to everyone and distributes the means unequally. Students trace each adaptation through cases.

    Open the lab: Told to Win

  • Criminology

    Why Didn't You?

    Control theory refuses the standard question. Instead of asking why some people offend, it asks why most people do not, and students apply that inversion to their own restraint.

    Open the lab: Why Didn't You?

  • Criminology

    The Mark

    Labeling theory and the field's third domain, which is the reaction to crime rather than its causes. Students follow what a criminal label does after it attaches.

    Open the lab: The Mark

  • Criminology

    Three Things Have to Line Up

    Routine activity theory takes the offender as given and asks what else had to be true. Students manipulate offender, target, and guardianship and watch which combinations produce an event.

    Open the lab: Three Things Have to Line Up

  • Criminology

    The Other Half

    Victimization, taught with care. The lab presents the patterns and the measurement problems without asking any student to disclose anything about themselves.

    Open the lab: The Other Half

  • Criminology

    What It Costs, What It Buys

    Five competing purposes of punishment that do not agree with each other. Students assign sentences, then discover which rationale their own choices actually served.

    Open the lab: What It Costs, What It Buys

  • Criminology

    Fix the Place

    Situational crime prevention changes the unit of analysis from the person to the event. Students redesign a setting and confront displacement.

    Open the lab: Fix the Place

  • Criminology

    The Pattern Is Not the Reason

    A writing lab for the moment a paper stalls, when a student has found a real pattern, reported it accurately, and stopped short of explaining it.

    Open the lab: The Pattern Is Not the Reason

  • Criminology

    The Askable Question

    Narrowing a topic into a question that can actually be answered, and finding peer-reviewed sources that speak to it rather than sources that merely share its vocabulary.

    Open the lab: The Askable Question

  • Criminology

    Apply the Theory

    Naming a theory is not applying one. The lab walks students from restating what a theory says to putting its mechanism to work on their own case.

    Open the lab: Apply the Theory

  • Criminology

    The Home Stretch

    An end-of-semester synthesis lab that turns four short scaffolded papers into one coherent account of what criminology knows about a single offense type.

    Open the lab: The Home Stretch

  • White-Collar Crime

    Who Counts

    Every count of white-collar crime starts with a definition, and the definitions disagree. Students sort real events under offender-based and offense-based definitions and see the totals move.

    Open the lab: Who Counts

  • White-Collar Crime

    Follow the Harm

    There is no national count of white-collar crime. There are a handful of general counting systems plus separate enforcement records at every regulatory agency with a statute. Students try to assemble a total and find out why nobody has.

    Open the lab: Follow the Harm

  • White-Collar Crime

    Sutherland's Count

    Sutherland counted 980 decisions against 70 corporations in 1949. Students repeat the count for eleven of today's largest companies in Violation Tracker, guess the numbers first, and then work out what a record count does and does not measure.

    Open the lab: Sutherland's Count

  • White-Collar Crime

    The Fraud Triangle

    Cressey interviewed 133 people imprisoned for violating financial trust and asked what had to be true for each of them. Students test the resulting triangle against cases it was not built from.

    Open the lab: The Fraud Triangle

  • White-Collar Crime

    The Sanction Threat

    A replication of the Paternoster and Simpson scenario study, in which managers weigh formal sanctions, informal sanctions, and moral inhibition. Students answer first and compare against the published results.

    Open the lab: The Sanction Threat

  • White-Collar Crime

    Strain on the Record

    Eight real cases, from WorldCom to a Houston embezzler with gambling debts, sorted by the strain the court record shows and by whether the offender was falling, holding steady, or rising, as a test of Wheeler's fear-of-falling idea.

    Open the lab: Strain on the Record

  • White-Collar Crime

    Denying the Guilty Mind

    Benson found that convicted white-collar offenders rarely denied the acts. They denied the criminality. Students classify real accounts and locate the line between explanation and excuse.

    Open the lab: Denying the Guilty Mind

  • White-Collar Crime

    Diffusion of Fraud

    A real oil and gas investment fraud that began as a legitimate business, reconstructed from the record, so students can watch the point at which the enterprise crossed over.

    Open the lab: Diffusion of Fraud

  • White-Collar Crime

    The Ponzi Machine

    A runnable model of a scheme financed by the people who have not yet found out. Students set the promised return and inflow rate and watch the arithmetic of collapse.

    Open the lab: The Ponzi Machine

  • White-Collar Crime

    Fraud, Abuse, or Neither

    Seven real health care cases, from a $10.6 billion catheter scheme to a hospital system's physician pay, sorted on Tennyson's planned or opportunistic and hard or soft cuts, with the law the government actually used.

    Open the lab: Fraud, Abuse, or Neither

  • White-Collar Crime

    The Price of a Death

    Workplace fatality investigations and the penalties that follow them. Students work with the enforcement record and compare the sanction against the harm.

    Open the lab: The Price of a Death

  • White-Collar Crime

    ECHO

    A guided exercise in the Environmental Protection Agency's public compliance database, in which students look up real facilities, read what inspectors found, and see what was done about it.

    Open the lab: ECHO

  • White-Collar Crime

    The Paycheck: National

    Wage theft as a property crime, worked through a pay stub. Students calculate what was taken, identify the mechanism, and compare it against the enforcement route available to the worker.

    Open the lab: The Paycheck: National

  • White-Collar Crime

    The Paycheck: Texas

    The Texas version of The Paycheck. Students audit eight pay records against the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Texas Payday Law, compute what each worker is owed, and look at enforcement in a state with no minimum wage or overtime law of its own.

    Open the lab: The Paycheck: Texas

  • White-Collar Crime

    Swap or Bet

    A contract that pays if a team wins is a swap under the Commodity Exchange Act and a bet under the Texas Penal Code. Students classify real products and defend the line they drew.

    Open the lab: Swap or Bet

  • White-Collar Crime

    The Deal

    Most corporate crime in the United States is resolved by agreement rather than by trial. Students read real deferred and non-prosecution agreements and weigh what each side obtained.

    Open the lab: The Deal

  • Research Methods

    Your First Chart in R

    Students make a chart from real survey data in RStudio, change it, and then make a chart of their own. The lab is written for students who have never written code, and every step says what to click and what they should see.

    Open the lab: Your First Chart in R

  • Research Methods

    Look at the Data

    Students open the General Social Survey, find out what it contains and what is missing from it, and fill in and run the code themselves for the first time.

    Open the lab: Look at the Data

  • Research Methods

    Ethics Casework

    Students register for CITI research ethics training, then apply a five-item ethics checklist to three famous studies: the Tuskegee syphilis study, Tearoom Trade, and Milgram's obedience experiments.

    Open the lab: Ethics Casework

  • Research Methods

    Grouping Categories

    Combining the categories of a variable is a measurement decision, and it can change the answer. Students group the same party identification answers two ways, group religion their own way, and read four GSS questions closely.

    Open the lab: Grouping Categories

  • Research Methods

    Sampling Variation

    Students treat the 21,483 GSS respondents as a population, draw random samples from it, and watch the answer move from sample to sample. Then they see what happens when the sampling list leaves people out.

    Open the lab: Sampling Variation

  • Research Methods

    Testing a Rival Explanation

    Older people in the GSS report watching more TV. Students find the pattern and then test whether work or marriage explains it better than age does.

    Open the lab: Testing a Rival Explanation

  • Research Methods

    Survey Questions Written by an AI Tool

    A free AI tool drafts ten survey questions on the concept in each student's research question. Students find the problems in each question and repair the three worst.

    Open the lab: Survey Questions Written by an AI Tool

  • Research Methods

    Build and Launch Your Survey

    Students build a ten-question survey in Google Forms and send it to their first respondents. Three questions are shared across the class so that one R script can read everyone's data.

    Open the lab: Build and Launch Your Survey

  • Research Methods

    Chart Your Own Survey

    Students load their own survey responses into R, chart a shared question and one of their own, and count how many respondents fall into each group.

    Open the lab: Chart Your Own Survey

  • Research Methods

    From Talk to Text

    Students transcribe ten minutes of their own interview and see how each choice about what to keep shapes what the analysis can find later.

    Open the lab: From Talk to Text

  • Research Methods

    Coding Your Interview

    Students code their transcript in Taguette with a class codebook, check their coding against a partner's on a practice transcript, and write a memo and a model of how their codes connect.

    Open the lab: Coding Your Interview

  • Research Methods

    Structured Observation

    Nobody can see community directly. Students plan a 30-minute observation in a public place, decide in advance which actions will count as evidence, and then write up what they found.

    Open the lab: Structured Observation

  • Research Methods

    Your Personal Network

    Students answer two name generators, describe the people they name, and say who knows whom. The lab shows how much a single survey question shapes the network a study finds.

    Open the lab: Your Personal Network

  • Research Methods

    Chart Your Personal Network

    Students load their Lab 13 network into R, measure how connected it is, and draw it twice, once plain and once colored by the question that named each person.

    Open the lab: Chart Your Personal Network

  • Research Methods

    Count the Words

    After coding ten court texts by hand, students have the computer count every word in a twenty-text corpus, chart the most frequent words, and use a short word list as a second coder.

    Open the lab: Count the Words