Coding Your Interview SOCL 3633 Research Methods · Lab 11 · Midwestern State University

Today your transcript becomes evidence for a claim. You code your transcript in Taguette with the class codebook, check your coding against a partner's on a practice transcript, then write a memo and draw a model of how your codes connect. Work through the tabs in order. Submit your response sheet and the picture of your model in the Lab 11 submission on D2L by Thursday, April 8, at 11:59 p.m.

Keep this page open while you work. Your entries on this page are not saved anywhere. Your coding in Taguette is saved in your Taguette account.

Set up Taguette

Upload only your transcript, with names removed. Do not upload your recording. Your consent text told your respondent that the typed version, with names removed, would be stored in Taguette.

The class codebook

Everyone starts with the same five codes, so that we can compare coding across the class. Create each one as a tag in Taguette: open the Highlights tab, click Create a tag, and copy in the name and description below.

Your own codes

As you code, you may find passages that fit none of these. You may add up to two codes of your own. Each one needs a name, a one-sentence description, and in your notes one example that counts and one that does not. Response sheet question 2 asks about them.

Code your transcript

  1. Read your whole transcript once without coding. Notice what repeats.
  2. Go back to the start. Select a passage by clicking and dragging. Click new highlight, choose one or more tags, and click Save & Close.
  3. Code passages, not single words. A passage is usually one to four sentences that make one point.
  4. Code the respondent's words, not your own opinion of them. "Something felt unfair" needs the respondent to present it as unfair.
  5. Skip your own questions unless the respondent's answer only makes sense with them.
  6. When you hesitate over a passage, write a line in a notes file: the passage, the code you chose, and why. Those notes become your memo.
Checkpoint. After 20 minutes, every one of the five codes should be applied at least once, or you should be able to say why a code does not fit your interview.

Two coders: the practice transcript

You and a partner code the same practice transcript, then compare. The respondent is a woman in her 30s who worked as a server at a chain restaurant. The transcript was written for this course. Do not show your own transcript to your partner.

  1. Code each passage on your own, using the class codebook. Check every code that fits, or "No code fits."
  2. When you and your partner have both finished, take turns reading your codes for each passage aloud. Mark whether your codes were the same.
  3. Pick one passage where you disagreed. Talk about why, and write the rule you would add to the codebook.
Same codes as your partner: 0 of 0 passages compared so far.
One disagreement, and the rule you would add
Name the passage number. This goes into question 3 of the response sheet.

Memo and model

Memo

Write one paragraph about your interview, using your codes and your notes. What do the codes suggest about how your respondent experienced the job? Quote at least one passage. This is response sheet question 4.

Model

  1. Go to app.diagrams.net. When it asks where to save, choose Device. Choose Create New Diagram, then Blank Diagram.
  2. Add one rectangle for each of two or three codes that seem connected in your interview. Type the code name in each.
  3. Draw arrows between them. Label each arrow with a few words that say how the codes connect, for example "led to" or "made worse."
  4. Click File, then Export as, then PNG. Save it as lastname_lab11_model.png.
Then look for a negative case: a part of your interview that does not fit your model. Response sheet question 5 asks about it. Finding one does not mean the model failed; it shows where the model needs a limit or a change.

Lab 11 response sheet

Answer in complete sentences. Then assemble your answers and paste them into the Lab 11 submission on D2L. In the same submission, upload the picture of your model. Both are due Thursday, April 8, at 11:59 p.m.

Your name
1. Which code was easiest to apply to your transcript, and which was hardest? Quote one passage for the hardest.
Two to three sentences.
2. Did you add a code? Give its name, its description, one example that counts, and one that does not.
If you did not add a code, say which passage came closest to needing one, and why you used an existing code instead.
3. On the practice transcript, on how many passages did you and your partner apply the same codes? Describe one disagreement and the rule you would add to settle it.
The count and your rule fill in from the Two coders tab. Add a sentence on why you disagreed.
4. Your memo: what do your codes suggest about how your respondent experienced the job?
One paragraph, with at least one quoted passage.
5. Your model: explain the arrows in your diagram. Then name one part of your interview that does not fit the model.
Three to four sentences.

Sources

Bernard, H. Russell, and Amber Wutich. 2026. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Chapter 12.
Rampin, Rémi, and Vicky Rampin. 2021. "Taguette: Open-Source Qualitative Data Analysis." Journal of Open Source Software 6(68):3522. https://www.taguette.org
diagrams.net (draw.io). Free diagram software. https://app.diagrams.net

The practice transcript was written for this course and does not describe a real person.